Level 2 specification
NR/L2/TEL/30047
Management of Safety Related Reports for Telecoms Failures
Issue 5, December 2009
Sets the national process for classifying, recording, investigating and reviewing safety related telecoms failures (SRTFs) in FMS and SINCS, with a two-stage Maintainer then Reviewer review and a hazard index scoring system. Appendix A gives the failure and incident ratings for each telecoms system type.
Clause map — what each clause deals with
| 1 | Purpose | Makes all safety related telecoms failures subject to one national classification, investigation and review system |
| 2 | Scope | Covers management of safety reports for telecoms failures, including helping other disciplines where telecoms may have contributed; signalling failures sit in NR/L2/SIG/10047 |
| 3 | Reference documentation | Lists linked group and NR standards on safety reporting, CCS failures, competence, incident investigation and SINCS/FMS data entry |
| 4 | Definitions | Terms such as high, low and negligible risk, positive but wrong, noisy and faint lines, crosstalk, sole protection telephone and SRTF |
| 5 | Safety Management System Requirements | Every safety related failure goes in FMS; high and low risk ones also in SINCS, investigated to root cause by competent people |
| 5.5 | Two independent stages | High risk, low risk and incident records pass through Stage 1 by the Maintainer and Stage 2 by the Reviewer |
| 5.6 | Criteria for Stage 2 review | Only records above set thresholds (hazard index 25 or more, failure or incident rating 5 or more) or escalated by the Maintainer go to Stage 2 |
| 5.7 | Negligible Risk | Everything else counts as negligible risk and is kept out of SINCS |
| 6.1 | The Integrated Control Centre shall | Control enters failures into FMS, creates SINCS records using the hazard index, caps early ratings when unclear, passes info to train operators and records test plans used |
| 6.2 | The Maintainer (Stage 1) shall | Maintainer checks and completes the SRTF record, investigates fully, reviews the hazard index, tracks trends and closes Stage 1 records |
| 6.2.1 | Record content check | Checklist of what the SRTF record must hold (system, cause, ratings, adjustment factors, test plan details) with a short deadline for updates |
| 6.2.7 | Trends and action plans | Recurring causes get a local project and action plan tracked on one master record; national issues flagged to the Reviewer |
| 6.2.10 | Closure target | Period-end target limiting how many records may stay open at Maintainer level, based on the previous three periods |
| 6.2.11 | Review of open records | Quarterly review of records open over 28 days; stalled ones may be closed as-is after repeated reviews with Reviewer agreement |
| 6.2.13 | Retention of records | Reports, test results and findings kept accessible for 6 years from Maintainer closure |
| 6.2.17 | RIDDOR reporting | Records meeting RIDDOR criteria are reported to ORR/RAIB under NR/L2/INV/002 |
| 6.2.18 | Negligible risk check | Independent check that each negligible-risk telecoms record has been classified correctly |
| 6.3 | Stage 2 - The Reviewer (Network Rail Centre) shall | Reviewer monitors the whole system and statistics, looks for national implications, runs national action plans, returns or closes records and keeps them 6 years |
| 6.3.12 | Data Quality Check | Periodic check of each fault control's FMS entries for correct risk ratings, with set statistics collected and shared |
| 6.3.13 | Sample review | Twice-yearly random sample of one day's failures from each fault control, shared with the control manager |
| 7 | Competence of Persons Involved | Everyone handling failure records must be shown competent; the S&T professional head defines how |
| 8 | Audit | Maintainer and control centre audited, initially every two years, adjusted by findings |
| 9.1 | Hazard Index System - Introduction | Numerical scoring of safety impact using location, failure and incident ratings, optionally adjusted |
| 9.2 | Hazard Index System - Definitions | Defines location (fixed for telecoms), failure, incident and adjustment ratings and how they combine into the hazard index |
| Appendix A | Hazard Ratings - Incident Ratings and Adjustment Factor | Rating values for incidents (collision, derailment, near miss etc.) and adjustment factors for fatalities, workmanship or design faults |
| Appendix A (General) | Failure Ratings - General notes applicable to all equipment types | Common failure modes rated across all assets, such as recorder faults and non-service-affecting power or mechanical faults; unlisted equipment rated by agreement |
| Appendix A (A) | Signal Post Telephone System | Failure ratings for SPT faults: labelling, wrong signaller, poor speech and unable to call |
| Appendix A (B-D) | Crossing Telephones: Uncontrolled, Automatic and Controlled Crossings | Ratings for crossing telephone failures by crossing type, scaled by whether one, some or all phones are lost |
| Appendix A (E-J) | Tunnel, Emergency, Direct Line, Concentrator, Signalbox Emergency and ECR voice | Ratings for tunnel telephones, emergency telephones, direct lines, concentrators, signal box emergency access and electrification control voice services |
| Appendix A (K-N) | NRN/ORN, Cab Secure Radio and RETB | Ratings for legacy radio system failures: NRN/ORN, CSR and RETB (section M removed and merged into GSM-R) |
| Appendix A (O-S) | Traction Supervisory, DOO CCTV and Section 12 stations | Ratings for telecoms-provided traction supervisory links, DOO CCTV and mirrors, and Section 12 station PA, CCTV and telephones |
| Appendix A (T) | GSM-R Radio System | Ratings for GSM-R faults including loss of coverage on a line or route |
| Appendix A (U) | Marine Radio System | Ratings for marine radio faults such as loss of coverage and squelch or tuning problems |